Internet crimes and the lawyer
Interview with Rome lawyer Fulvio Sarzana di S.Ippolito, published in the digital agenda newspaper.
What are the main crimes on the Internet?
What are the main newly introduced crimes?
Also to be underlined, he explains Supreme Court lawyer Fulvio Sarzana, that even “grooming is a crime”.
The lure it is in fact provided for in article 609 undicies of the penal code.
The question is whether Chat control, at the center of a heated debate in recent months, up to the opposition of Germany, could be a useful tool for preventing the phenomenon. According to Sarzana, "prevention methods have never been such as to involve personal conversations, but always to address a past event and block something available online. The difference between Chat Control and other provisions, While there is the possibility of intervention from a prevention perspective, intercepting personal encryption is another matter entirely; it means directly intruding into everyone's lives. Even conceptually, our provisions include a prohibition, in the DSA, that is, the prohibition of preventive surveillance, even through the interception of traffic packets.”.
Enabling Chat Control "would mean giving up the basic principles of our democracy, it would conflict with existing EU rules. In the US, too, at the beginning of the 2000s, there was a similar debate, which reached the Supreme Court, to adopt mechanisms to protect minors by placing filters on school computers to prevent children from go and see certain contents – adds Sarzana -. The Court declared the rule unconstitutional, explaining that from a perspective of balancing of rights Filters don't play a positive role in the circulation of information. In short, you can't penetrate citizens' lives in this way.".
Internet crimes and the lawyer
English 
Italian 